{
  "generator": "ai-ds-lab/metrics/retrospection-s2-verify.mjs",
  "criterionSource": "lab 自写（纯脚本复核 AI 裁决的自洽性与证据可定位性）",
  "judgeModel": "claude-opus-5[1m]",
  "judgePanel": "single-judge ⚠️ 未满足 spec §6.1 铁律 1 的异构陪审团（3 个不同厂商/型号投票），也未做铁律 2 的评委方差抽样复判。见报告 §边界登记。",
  "checks": [
    "C1 行集合一致",
    "C2 枚举",
    "C3 证据逐字可定位",
    "C4 至少一条证据",
    "C5 delete 不推翻确定性读数",
    "C6 low 不得配 delete",
    "C7 提炼承诺非空"
  ],
  "boundaries": [
    "B1 只验裁决自洽 + 证据可定位，不验语义正确 —— 语义靠 §11.4 安全网第 1 层（跑 DS 自己的 gate）",
    "B2 C3 逐字匹配：改写过的引文一律判失败（故意的）",
    "B3 本轮单裁判，本器不验评委方差"
  ],
  "pass": true,
  "stats": {
    "rows": 35,
    "byVerdict": {
      "extract-then-delete": 32,
      "delete": 2,
      "hold-for-human": 1
    },
    "totalEvidence": 108,
    "linesByVerdict": {
      "extract-then-delete": {
        "count": 32,
        "lines": 4105
      },
      "delete": {
        "count": 2,
        "lines": 94
      },
      "hold-for-human": {
        "count": 1,
        "lines": 466
      }
    }
  },
  "failures": []
}